Johnson v. Sindy

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit October 20, 2014

Johnson v. Sindy, 585 F. App'x 16 (4th Cir. 2014)

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Johnson appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *17Johnson v. Svndy, No. 8:14-cv-01188-DKC (D.Md. Apr. 28, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name: Anthony JOHNSON v. G. SINDY, in his individual capacity R. Roderick, in his individual capacity Dr. Jack Cunning, in his individual capacity
Status: Published