U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2014

Lordmaster v. Hinkle

Lordmaster v. Hinkle
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 22, 2014 · Motz, Thacker, Wynn
585 F. App'x 42

Lordmaster v. Hinkle

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Frankie Jae LordMaster appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to some Defendants on Lord-Master’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint and dismissing without prejudice the claims against the remaining Defendants pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(l) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny LordMaster’s pending Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion, and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lordmaster v. Hinkle, No. 7:13-cv-00506-MFU-RSB, 2014 WL 3359389 (W.D.Va. July 9, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.