Daniell v. Vukosa
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Anand L. Daniell appeals the district court’s order certifying a class for a class action complaint and approving a settlement agreement, thereby overruling Dan-iell’s objection to the settlement. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Daniell v. Vukosa, Nos. 1:13-cv-02271-JFM; 1:13-cv-02332-JFM; 1:13-cv-02377-JFM; 1:13-cv-02483-JKB (D.Md. Apr. 18, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Anand L. DANIELL v. Michael VUKOSA, Individually on behalf Himself and All Others Similarly Situated Michael Josenhans, Individually on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated Robert Collier, Individually on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated Sally Lebow, and SourceFire, Inc. John C. Becker Martin F. Roesch Steven R. Polk Tim A. Guleri Michael Cristinziano Arnold L. Punaro Charles E. Peters, Jr. Kevin M. Klausmeyer Cisco Systems, Incorporated Shasta Acquisition Corp. Acquisition Corp.
- Status
- Published