U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2014

In re Sweat

In re Sweat
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided November 20, 2014 · Gregory, Motz, Niemeyer
585 F. App'x 199

In re Sweat

Opinion of the Court

Petition denied by unpubhshed PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpubhshed opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kenon Durell Sweat petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. According, although we grant Sweat’s motion to amend his financial statement and grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.