U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2014

Raja v. Merscorp Inc.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided November 20, 2014 · Gregory, Motz, Niemeyer

585 F. App'x 201

Counsel

Mohammad Nawaz Raja, Neelum Na-waz Raja, Appellants Pro Se. Billy Bernard Ruhling, II, Troutman Sanders, LLP, Tysons Corner, Virginia; Ryan Christopher Day, LeClair Ryan, PC, Alexandria, Virginia; Fred O. Goldberg, Berger Sing-erman LLP, Miami, Florida; Minodora Daniela Vancea, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Arlington, Virginia; Vernon Anthony Andrew Cassin, III, David A. Super, Baker Botts, LLP, Washington, D.C.; Ellery Johannessen, Abby Kelley Moynihan, McCabe Weisberg & Conway, LLC, Laurel, Maryland; Alexander Richard Green, McGinnis Wutscher Beiramee, LLP, Bethesda, Maryland, for Appellees.

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Mohammad Nawaz Raja and Neelum Nawaz Raja appeal the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice their civil action challenging the legality of a foreclosure proceeding. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Raja v. MERSCORP Inc., No. 1:13-cv-00944-LO-TRJ (E.D. Va. June 17, 2014). We deny Rajas’ motion to correct the record on appeal and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.