U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2014

Donohue v. Hinkle

Donohue v. Hinkle
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided November 25, 2014 · Hamilton, Keenan, King
585 F. App'x 266

Donohue v. Hinkle

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

John Donohue appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Donohue v. Hinkle, No. 7:14-cv-00138-GEC-RSB (W.D.Va. May 15, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented *267in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.