Spencer v. Garvin

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Spencer v. Garvin, 585 F. App'x 851 (4th Cir. 2014)

Spencer v. Garvin

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Janies Spencer appeals the district court’s orders denying Spencer’s latest motions for recusal of the district court judge and for a “declaratory judgment” vacating the judgment on the settlement agreement in this case. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Spencer v. Garvin, No. 4:02-cv-01859-RBH (D.S.C. June 11 & 18, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
James SPENCER, and Rodney Keith Lail Irene Santacroce Southern Holdings, Incorporated Ricky Stephens Marguerite Stephens Doris Holt v. Ancil B. GARVIN, III David Smith Horry County, South Carolina Horry County Police Department James Albert Allen, Jr. Sidney Rick Thompson Jeffrey S. Caldwell Charles McClendon Jay Brantly Andy Christensen Harold Steven Hartness Michael Steven Hartness
Status
Published