Andrews v. Gates

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Andrews v. Gates, 587 F. App'x 75 (4th Cir. 2014)

Andrews v. Gates

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Donald W. Andrews, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing this action alleging malicious prosecution, extortion, RICO violations and mail fraud. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Andrews v. Wolcott Rivers Gates, No. 3:14-cv-00076-HEH, 2014 WL 3016488 (E.D.Va. July 3, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
Donald ANDREWS v. Wolcott Rivers GATES W. Brantley Basnight David M. Bastiaans Richard E. Biemiller Steven L. Brown Adam M. Carroll Barry Dorans Carl A. Eason Cheshire I'Anson Eveleigh John F. Faber Ronald M. Gates Ameet I. Habib Douglas E. Kahle Kyle D. Korte Stephan J. Lipskis Samuel W. Meekins Mark V. Pascucci M. Powell Peters Stephen P. Pfeiffer Anthony F. Radd David N. Reda Cartwright R. Reilly Wilson L. Rivers Glen M. Robertson C. Arthur Robinson John F. Sawyer Cullen D. Speckhart Leslie R. Watson Marshall A. Winslow Edward W. Wolcott Brandon H. Zeigler
Status
Published