Ramey v. Traxler

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit December 19, 2014

Ramey v. Traxler, 588 F. App'x 260 (4th Cir. 2014)

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ryan Randall Ramey appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ramey v. Chief Justice Wm. B. Traxler, No. 1:14-cv-02390-WMN (D.Md. Aug. 18, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are ade*261quately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name: Ryan Randall RAMEY v. Chief Justice William B. TRAXLER, Jr. Judge Diana Gribbon Motz Judge G. Steven Agee Judge Clyde H. Hamilton Richard Sewell, Case Manager Samuel W. Phillips, Secretary John Doe, c/o Secretary Jane Doe, c/o Secretary
Status: Published