U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2014

United States v. Coppedge

United States v. Coppedge
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 23, 2014 · Shedd, Thacker, Wynn
589 F. App'x 103

United States v. Coppedge

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Donnell Coppedge appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a new sentencing hearing. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Coppedge, No. 4:09-cr-00054-F-l (E.D.N.C. Aug. 1, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.