Earl Cox v. Charles Ratledge

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Earl Cox v. Charles Ratledge

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7129

EARL WEBSTER COX,

Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

CHARLES RATLEDGE,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:14-hc-02102-H)

Submitted: November 12, 2014 Decided: January 16, 2015

Before KEENAN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Earl Webster Cox, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Earl Webster Cox, a federal prisoner, appeals the

district court’s order denying relief on his

28 U.S.C. § 2241

(2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. Cox v. Ratledge, No. 5:14-hc-02102-H

(E.D.N.C. July 21, 2014). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid

the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished