Orlando Brown v. South Carolina, State of
Orlando Brown v. South Carolina, State of
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-2155
ORLANDO IRA BROWN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SOUTH CAROLINA, STATE OF,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Margaret B. Seymour, Senior District Judge. (3:13-cv-02983-MBS)
Submitted: January 15, 2015 Decided: January 20, 2015
Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Orlando Brown, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Orlando Brown appeals the district court’s order
adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and
dismissing without prejudice his discrimination complaint
against the State of South Carolina as barred by res judicata.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Brown v. South Carolina, No. 3:13-cv-02983-MBS (D.S.C.
Sept. 24, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished