U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2015

Orlando Brown v. South Carolina, State of

Orlando Brown v. South Carolina, State of
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 20, 2015

Orlando Brown v. South Carolina, State of

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-2155

ORLANDO IRA BROWN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA, STATE OF, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Margaret B. Seymour, Senior District Judge. (3:13-cv-02983-MBS)

Submitted: January 15, 2015 Decided: January 20, 2015

Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Orlando Brown, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Orlando Brown appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and dismissing without prejudice his discrimination complaint against the State of South Carolina as barred by res judicata.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brown v. South Carolina, No. 3:13-cv-02983-MBS (D.S.C. Sept. 24, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.