United States v. Warren Newell

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Warren Newell

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7461

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

WARREN ROSSLYN NEWELL,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (1:14-cr-00022-MR-DLH-1)

Submitted: January 15, 2015 Decided: January 21, 2015

Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Warren Rosslyn Newell, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Richard Ascik, Richard Lee Edwards, Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorneys, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Warren Rosslyn Newell appeals the district court’s

order denying without prejudice his motion to recover personal

property. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 41(g). This court may exercise

jurisdiction only over final orders,

28 U.S.C. § 1291

(2012),

and certain interlocutory and collateral orders,

28 U.S.C. § 1292

(2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.

Loan Corp.,

337 U.S. 541, 545-46

(1949). The order Newell seeks

to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable

interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the

appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid

the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished