Keith Godwin v. Harold Clarke
Keith Godwin v. Harold Clarke
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7534
KEITH EARL GODWIN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
HAROLD CLARKE, Director; ROBERT F. HALEY, II, Commonwealth Attorney; CHESAPEAKE CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:13-cv-00691-RAJ-TEM)
Submitted: January 15, 2015 Decided: January 21, 2015
Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Keith Earl Godwin, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Keith Earl Godwin appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his civil action filed pursuant to
42 U.S.C. § 1983(2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Godwin v. Clarke, No. 2:13-cv-00691-RAJ-TEM
(E.D. Va. Sept. 25, 2014). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished