Keith Godwin v. Harold Clarke
Keith Godwin v. Harold Clarke
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7534
KEITH EARL GODWIN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. HAROLD CLARKE, Director; ROBERT F. HALEY, II, Commonwealth Attorney; CHESAPEAKE CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:13-cv-00691-RAJ-TEM)
Submitted: January 15, 2015 Decided: January 21, 2015
Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Keith Earl Godwin, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Keith Earl Godwin appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Godwin v. Clarke, No. 2:13-cv-00691-RAJ-TEM (E.D. Va. Sept. 25, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.