U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2015

Doyle Ham, Jr. v. Department of Public Safety

Doyle Ham, Jr. v. Department of Public Safety
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 26, 2015

Doyle Ham, Jr. v. Department of Public Safety

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-1779

DOYLE R. HAM, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES; DAYENA CORCOREN; JOHN WOLFE; JOHN LOTTICH; GARY MAYNARD; PAULA GREEN-HOLT; CYNTHIA BRISCOE; BRUCE CHAPMAN; BRENDA SHELL-ELEAZER; RODNEY BURGER; MARGARET CHIPPENDALE; BRIAN KAUFFMAN, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. James K. Bredar, District Judge. (1:13-cv-03501-JKB)

Submitted: January 22, 2015 Decided: January 26, 2015

Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Doyle R. Ham, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Judith Ann Barr, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Pikesville, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Doyle R. Ham, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint for failing to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ham v. Dep’t of Pub. Safety & Corr. Servs., No. 1:13-cv-03501-JKB (D.

Md. filed July 10, 2014 & entered July 11, 2014). We also deny Ham’s motion for injunctive relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.