Daniel King v. Attorney General
Daniel King v. Attorney General
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7439
DANIEL H. KING,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ATTORNEY GENERAL ERIC HOLDER; KATHLEEN SIBELIUS; CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR.; JUSTIN ANDREWS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:13-ct-03179-FL)
Submitted: January 22, 2015 Decided: January 27, 2015
Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Daniel H. King, Appellant Pro Se. Kimberly Ann Moore, Thomas Gray Walker, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Daniel H. King appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six
Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,
403 U.S. 388(1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. King v. Holder, No. 5:13-ct-03179-FL (E.D.N.C.
Sept. 22, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished