Bradley Maxwell v. David Robinson
Bradley Maxwell v. David Robinson
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7654
BRADLEY MAXWELL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DAVID ROBINSON; GEORGE HINKLE; GREGORY HOLLOWAY; U. M. SWINEY; DENNIS COLLINS; LT. KING; JOHN COMBS; TODD FARRIS; IHO BURTON; C/O WRIGHT; C/O BELLAMY; ADINA POGUE; COUNSELOR TREADWAY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (7:13-cv-00556-JLK-RSB)
Submitted: January 22, 2015 Decided: January 27, 2015
Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bradley Maxwell, Appellant Pro Se. Kate Elizabeth Dwyre, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Bradley Maxwell appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his
42 U.S.C. § 1983(2012) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Maxwell v. Robinson, No. 7:13-cv-00556-JLK-RSB (W.D. Va.
Oct. 30, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished