Bobby Gilbert v. William Byars
Bobby Gilbert v. William Byars
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7290
BOBBY GILBERT, Plaintiff - Appellant, and CARL POLLEN, Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM R. BYARS, Agency Director, South Carolina Department of Corrections; JOSEPH MCFADDEN, Warden; DANTE WRIGHT; JEROME MIDDLETON; RACHEL LADAGGA; MS. ROPPER; MS. FOWLER; THOMAS SEARS; TARRANCE JACKSON, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge. (2:13-cv-02163-MGL)
Submitted: January 22, 2015 Decided: January 27, 2015
Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bobby Gilbert, Appellant Pro Se. Hugh Willcox Buyck, Gordon Wade Cooper, BUYCK, SANDERS & SIMMONS, Charleston, South Carolina; Elloree Ann Ganes, Robert Holmes Hood, Benjamin Houston Joyce, Thomas Happel Scurry, HOOD LAW FIRM, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Bobby Gilbert appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) claims without prejudice for failure to properly exhaust his administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Gilbert v. Byars, No. 2:13-cv-02163-MGL (D.S.C. Aug.
14, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.