U. S. ex rel. Mark W. Prince v. Virginia Resources Authority

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

U. S. ex rel. Mark W. Prince v. Virginia Resources Authority

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-1690

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. MARK W. PRINCE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

VIRGINIA RESOURCES AUTHORITY,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

SHENANDOAH COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS; U. S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION; SUNTRUST BANK; SUNTRUST EQUIPMENT FINANCE & LEASING CORPORATION,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Michael F. Urbanski, District Judge. (5:13-cv-00045-MFU)

Submitted: January 29, 2015 Decided: February 13, 2015

Before THACKER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bradley Glenn Pollack, Woodstock, Virginia, for Appellant. Jeffrey M. Summers, THE LAW OFFICE OF JEFFREY M. SUMMERS, PLLC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Mark W. Prince appeals the district court’s orders

dismissing his qui tam action against Virginia Resources

Authority and others under the False Claims Act, see

31 U.S.C. § 3729

(a)-3733 et seq. (2012), and denying Prince’s motion to

alter or amend judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We have

reviewed the arguments on appeal and the record, and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. United States ex rel. Prince v. Va. Res.

Auth., No. 5:13-cv-00045-MFU (W.D. Va. Apr. 14, 2014; July 10,

2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

3

Reference

Status
Unpublished