United States v. Samuel Crook
United States v. Samuel Crook
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-4799
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
SAMUEL PAUL CROOK,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 14-4801
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
SAMUEL PAUL CROOK,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Max O. Cogburn, Jr., District Judge. (3:04-cr-00058-MOC-DSC-1; 3:04-cr-00059-MOC- DSC-1)
Submitted: February 12, 2015 Decided: February 18, 2015
Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Samuel Paul Cook, Appellant Pro Se. Craig Darren Randall, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina; Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2 PER CURIAM:
Samuel Paul Cook appeals the district court’s orders
denying his pro se motion requesting that his 2005 plea of not
guilty by reason of insanity be withdrawn. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
Crook, Nos. 3:04-cr-00058-MOC-DSC-1; 3:04-cr-00059-MOC-DSC-1
(W.D.N.C. Sept. 16, 2014). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished