United States v. Samuel Crook

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Samuel Crook

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-4799

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

SAMUEL PAUL CROOK,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 14-4801

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

SAMUEL PAUL CROOK,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Max O. Cogburn, Jr., District Judge. (3:04-cr-00058-MOC-DSC-1; 3:04-cr-00059-MOC- DSC-1)

Submitted: February 12, 2015 Decided: February 18, 2015

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Samuel Paul Cook, Appellant Pro Se. Craig Darren Randall, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina; Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Samuel Paul Cook appeals the district court’s orders

denying his pro se motion requesting that his 2005 plea of not

guilty by reason of insanity be withdrawn. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.

Crook, Nos. 3:04-cr-00058-MOC-DSC-1; 3:04-cr-00059-MOC-DSC-1

(W.D.N.C. Sept. 16, 2014). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid

the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3

Reference

Status
Unpublished