Kenneth Awe v. George Hinkle

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Kenneth Awe v. George Hinkle

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7737

KENNETH VALENTINE AWE,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

GEORGE HINKLE, VDOC Regional Administrator; ROSP WARDEN MATHENA, Warden; ROSP ASS/WARDEN WALRATH, A/Warden,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (7:14-cv-00178-JLK-RSB)

Submitted: February 12, 2015 Decided: February 19, 2015

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenneth V. Awe, Appellant Pro Se. Kate Elizabeth Dwyre, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Kenneth V. Awe appeals the district court’s order

granting summary judgment in favor of the defendants in Awe’s

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2012) action. On appeal, we confine our review

to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R.

34(b). Because Awe’s informal brief does not challenge the

basis for the district court’s disposition, Awe has forfeited

appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm

the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid

the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished