U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2015

Harold Strickland v. Mike Mondule

Harold Strickland v. Mike Mondule
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 12, 2015

Harold Strickland v. Mike Mondule

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7465

HAROLD E. STRICKLAND, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MIKE MONDULE, Sheriff; SERGEANT BREA; SERGEANT MILAM; SERGEANT CALLAHAN; SERGEANT BOOTH; DANVILLE CITY JAIL; JOHN DOE(S); CHIEF DEPUTY SALMON, Defendants – Appellees, and THE CITY OF DANVILLE, Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James P. Jones, District Judge. (7:12-cv-00559-JPJ-PMS)

Submitted: February 27, 2015 Decided: March 12, 2015

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Harold E. Strickland, Appellant Pro Se. John Chadwick Johnson, Christopher Carey Newton, FRITH, ANDERSON & PEAKE, PC, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Harold E. Strickland appeals the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and entering judgment for Defendants in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Strickland v. Mondule, No. 7:12-cv-00559-JPJ-PMS (W.D.

Va. Sept. 8, 2014). We deny the motions for appointment of counsel, for preparation of a transcript at government expense, and to appear at oral argument, and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.