Starsha Sewell v. Strayer University

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Starsha Sewell v. Strayer University

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-2123

STARSHA SEWELL,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

STRAYER UNIVERSITY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Senior District Judge. (8:12-cv-02927-DKC)

Submitted: February 24, 2015 Decided: March 11, 2015

Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Starsha Sewell, Appellant Pro Se. Denise E. Giraudo, Joleen Okun, OGLETREE DEAKINS NASH SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Starsha Sewell appeals the district court’s order denying

her Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion and her motions for

reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. Sewell v. Strayer Univ., No.

8:12-cv-02927-DKC (D. Md. Apr. 18, Sept. 18, Sept. 26, Oct. 3,

2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished