U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2015

United States v. Christopher Rogers

United States v. Christopher Rogers
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 19, 2015 · Wynn, Diaz, Thacker
598 F. App'x 188

United States v. Christopher Rogers

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

In accordance with a written plea agreement, Christopher Ray-Bryan Rogers pled *189 guilty to possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) (2012). Rogers was sentenced as an armed career criminal to 200 months in prison. He now appeals, claiming that the district court erred when it increased his term of imprisonment based upon prior convictions that were neither alleged in the indictment nor found by a jury. Rogers concedes, however, that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). We are “bound by Almendarez-Torres unless and until the Supreme Court says otherwise.” United States v. Graham, 711 F.3d 445, 455 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 134 S.Ct. 449, 187 L.Ed.2d 300 (2013). The Supreme Court has not overruled Almenda-rez-Torres.

We accordingly affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.