U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2015

Bernard McFadden v. Cynthia York

Bernard McFadden v. Cynthia York
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 19, 2015

Bernard McFadden v. Cynthia York

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7572

BERNARD MCFADDEN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MS. CYNTHIA YORK, Classification Officer of Kershaw Correctional Institution; MS. CECILIA REYNOLDS, Warden of KRCI; MS. L. MILLER, a/k/a Lula Miller, First Name Unknown, Lieutenant of KRCI, in their individual or personal capacities; JOHN OR JANE DOE, a/k/a Jane Doe, Clerk, US District Court; MR. J. C. GASTON, a/k/a Jannita C. Gaston, Grievance Hearing Officer; in their individual or personal capacities, Defendants – Appellees, and JOHN OR JANE DOES, Step 2 Grievance Hearing Officers, Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. J. Michelle Childs, District Judge. (8:13-cv-02278-JMC)

Submitted: March 17, 2015 Decided: March 19, 2015

Before WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bernard McFadden, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Bernard McFadden appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

McFadden v. York, No. 8:13-cv-02278-JMC (D.S.C. Sept. 29, 2014).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.