U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2015

Rodney Young v. South Carolina Dep't of Corrections

Rodney Young v. South Carolina Dep't of Corrections
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 2, 2015

Rodney Young v. South Carolina Dep't of Corrections

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7608

RODNEY DAVID YOUNG, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; LIEUTENANT PATRICK; CAPTAIN WRIGHT; OFFICER SABRINA RISHER; OFFICER JEFFREY MOSLEY; MS. VALERIE JACKSON; MS. J. BROWN; SERGEANT GREEN; WARDEN LEVERN COHEN, et al., Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge. (1:14-cv-02247-TMC)

Submitted: March 31, 2015 Decided: April 2, 2015

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rodney David Young, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Rodney David Young appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. As to Young’s claim challenging the propriety of his prison disciplinary proceeding, we have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Young v. South Carolina Dep’t of Corr., No. 1:14-cv-02247-TMC (D.S.C. Oct. 14, 2014). Young has forfeited appellate review of his remaining claims by failing to raise them in his informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.