U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2015

United States v. Nathan Wilkins

United States v. Nathan Wilkins
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 20, 2015

United States v. Nathan Wilkins

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6225

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. NATHAN KINTA WILKINS, a/k/a Kat Daddy, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (4:08-cr-00043-FL-1)

Submitted: April 16, 2015 Decided: April 20, 2015

Before AGEE and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nathan Kinta Wilkins, Appellant Pro Se. William Glenn Perry, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, North Carolina; Seth Morgan Wood, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Nathan Kinta Wilkins appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Wilkins’ motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Wilkins, Nos. 4:08-cr-00043-FL-1; 4:11-cv-00179-FL (E.D.N.C. Jan. 21, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.