Larry Scott, Jr. v. Major Jones
Larry Scott, Jr. v. Major Jones
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7644
LARRY W. SCOTT, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MAJOR JONES; LIEUTENANT CLAWSON; LIEUTENANT MURANT, or Marant; OFFICER GREENE; OFFICER ANDERSON; OFFICER HOPKINS, or Hodges; OFFICER JEFFCOAT; JOHN AND JANE DOES; DR. CHERI, Defendants – Appellees, and OFFICER HODGES, Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Orangeburg. David C. Norton, District Judge. (5:13-cv-02870-DCN)
Submitted: April 16, 2015 Decided: April 20, 2015
Before AGEE and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Larry W. Scott, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Justin Tyler Bagwell, William Henry Davidson, II, DAVIDSON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South Carolina; James E. Parham, Jr., Irmo, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Larry W. Scott, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court.
Scott v. Jones, No. 5:13-cv-02870-DCN (D.S.C. Sept. 25, 2014).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.