U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2015

Curtis King v. SC Dept of Corrections

Curtis King v. SC Dept of Corrections
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 21, 2015

Curtis King v. SC Dept of Corrections

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6058

CURTIS L. KING, Petitioner - Appellant, v. SC DEPT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (0:14-cv-01677-RBH)

Submitted: April 16, 2015 Decided: April 21, 2015

Before AGEE and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Curtis L. King, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Curtis L. King appeals the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice his petition for a writ of mandamus. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because King does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition in his informal brief, he has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.