U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2015

Jesse Yates, III v. Julie Garrison

Jesse Yates, III v. Julie Garrison
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 27, 2015

Jesse Yates, III v. Julie Garrison

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-2394

JESSE G. YATES, III; MELISSA LONG YATES, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. JULIE GARRISON, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L.

Voorhees, District Judge. (5:14-cv-00068-RLV-DSC)

Submitted: April 23, 2015 Decided: April 27, 2015

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jesse G. Yates, III, Melissa Long Yates, Appellants Pro Se.

Richard Caldarone, Joan Iris Oppenheimer, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Jesse G. Yates, III, and Melissa Long Yates appeal the district court’s order denying relief on their complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971) and related claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Yates v. Garrison, No. 5:14-cv-00068-RLV-DSC (W.D.N.C. Nov. 20, 2014).

We deny the Yateses’ motion to strike the informal response brief and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.