Dorel Pickett v. M. Rawls
Dorel Pickett v. M. Rawls
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7779
DOREL PICKETT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DEPUTY M. RAWLS, 71 Sussex S. D.; LIEUTENANT BANTY, Sussex Lieutenant; DEPUTY CHERRY, Sussex Deputy, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Arenda L. Wright Allen, District Judge. (2:14-cv-00278-AWA-DEM)
Submitted: April 23, 2015 Decided: April 27, 2015
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dorel Pickett, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Dorel Pickett appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Pickett v. Rawls, No. 2:14-cv-00278-AWA-DEM (E.D. Va. Nov. 10, 2014).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.