United States v. Lorenzo Wilder
United States v. Lorenzo Wilder
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6149
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. LORENZO RUDY WILDER, a/k/a Dolo, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:09-cr-00207-FL-1; 5:11-cv-00771-FL)
Submitted: April 24, 2015 Decided: May 1, 2015
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lorenzo Rudy Wilder, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. May-Parker, Assistant United States Attorney, Eric David Goulian, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Lorenzo Rudy Wilder appeals the district court’s order accepting in part the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his motions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) and 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Wilder, Nos. 5:09-cr-00207-FL-1; 5:11-cv-00771-FL (E.D.N.C. Jan.
21, 2014). We deny Wilder’s motions to appoint counsel and to seal his informal brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.