Dr. Greg Battersby v. Dr. Joseph Carew
Dr. Greg Battersby v. Dr. Joseph Carew
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1937
DR. GREG BATTERSBY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DR. JOSEPH CAREW, in his individual and official capacities; DR. RICHARD HEAVNER, in his individual and official capacities; DR. BRIAN HUGHES, in his individual and official capacities; DR. JEANNE MCDANIEL-GREEN, in her individual and official capacities; DR. JOHN MCGINNIS, in his individual and official capacities; DR. DAVID MRUZ, in his individual and official capacities; DR. RALPH ROLES, in his individual and official capacities; DR. HARVEY GARCIA, in his individual and official capacities; E. J. MERCER, in his individual and official capacities; JOHN DOES 1-10, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (8:14-cv-00761-HMH)
Submitted: February 24, 2015 Decided: May 5, 2015
Before KEENAN, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bruce Fein, BRUCE FEIN & ASSOCIATES, INC., Washington, D.C.; Donald L. Smith, Anderson, South Carolina, for Appellant.
Eugene H. Matthews, RICHARDSON PLOWDEN & ROBINSON, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Dr. Greg Battersby appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint by granting summary judgment for Defendants. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Battersby v. Carew, No. 8:14-cv-00761-HMH (D.S.C. Aug. 28, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.