In Re: Jose Amu v.
In Re: Jose Amu v.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1289
In Re: JOSE NACACIO AMU, a/k/a Amu, a/k/a Sld Dft 3:97-40-11, Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (3:97-cr-00040-FDW-11)
Submitted: April 7, 2015 Decided: May 14, 2015
Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jose Nacacio Amu, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Jose Nacacio Amu petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court recently denied Amu’s motion for a sentence reduction based on Amendment 782, and the court previously denied him a sentence reduction based on Amendment 750.
Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Amu’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.