Thomas Fair, Jr. v. Brian Stirling
Thomas Fair, Jr. v. Brian Stirling
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6128
THOMAS M. FAIR, JR., a/k/a Thomas Marvin Fair, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BRIAN P. STIRLING, Director; DR. JOHN B. TOMARCHIO; DR. RANDOLPH, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (6:13-cv-02940-RMG)
Submitted: May 21, 2015 Decided: May 26, 2015
Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thomas Marvin Fair, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Samuel F. Arthur, III, Jay Ritchie Lee, AIKEN, BRIDGES, NUNN, ELLIOTT & TYLER, PA, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Thomas Marvin Fair, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders: (1) accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012), complaint, and (2) denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Fair v. Stirling, No. 6:13-cv-02940-RMG (D.S.C. Dec. 10, 2014; filed Jan. 20, 2015 & entered Jan. 21, 2015). We deny Fair’s motion for appointment of counsel and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.