U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2015

Belay Reddick v. Pamela Justice

Belay Reddick v. Pamela Justice
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 26, 2015

Belay Reddick v. Pamela Justice

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6084

BELAY REDDICK, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. PAMELA JUSTICE; MARY M. MITCHELL; J. HOLLETT; JOSEPH NEAL; OSCAR ACOSTA; WANDA HARRIS; ROY LATHROP; WARREN C. HOLLAND; LEE HAMAR; S. TAYLOR; K. JOHNSON; M. CRUZ; S. LANGFORD; B. KEMP; R. CELAYA; D. COLON; D. MERCADO; J. SIMMONS; E. RAYBURN; T. MILLER; R. KELSO; S. LATHROP; T. TALPLACIDO; D. AYOTTE; M. WALKER; D.

BARBARENO; E. MCLELLAN; T. GRAVES; J. STIVERS; M. STRONG; M.

MOORE; D. FRANKS; F. HILL; F. BROCKINGTON, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (2:13-cv-03379-DCN)

Submitted: May 21, 2015 Decided: May 26, 2015

Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Belay Reddick, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Belay Reddick appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Reddick v. Justice, No. 2:13-cv-03379-DCN (D.S.C. Jan. 6, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.