U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2015

Anne Bremus v. AMR Corporation

Anne Bremus v. AMR Corporation
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 16, 2015
604 F. App'x 324

Anne Bremus v. AMR Corporation

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-2301

ANNE MELCHOR BREMUS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. AMR CORPORATION; AMERICAN AIRLINES, INCORPORATED; AMERICAN EAGLE AIRLINES, INCORPORATED, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief District Judge. (2:12-cv-00100-RBS-LRL)

Submitted: May 29, 2015 Decided: June 16, 2015

Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John B. Mann, JOHN B. MANN, P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Daniel E. Farrington, THE FARRINGTON LAW FIRM, LLC, Bethesda, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Anne Melchor Bremus appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(c) motion for judgment on the pleadings on Bremus’s discrimination and retaliation claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2012). Bremus has filed a motion for leave to file materials as an attachment to her opening brief, and Defendants have filed a motion for leave to file a supplemental appendix. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant the parties’ pending motions and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bremus v. AMR Corp., No. 2:12-cv-00100-RBS- LRL (E.D. Va. Nov. 3, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.