Andrew Taylor v. Ronald Davis
Cases that cite this one
6 later published cases cite this decision.
- Reiner v. Paneth (District Court, E.D. New York 2025)
- Verkon v. Ollis (United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina 2021)
- Arguedas v. Ollis (United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina 2021)
- Thompson v. Ollis (United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina 2021)
- Thompson v. Ollis (United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina 2021)
- Chapman v. Ollis (United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina 2021)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Ronald Jefferson Davis, Jr., appeals from the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and upholding the bankruptcy court’s determination that the debt he owes to Andrew and Naomi Taylor is non-disehargeable in his bankruptcy case. On appeal, Davis argues only that the Taylors failed to timely file the certificate of service for the amended complaint and that the bankruptcy court erred by denying his motion to strike the amended complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration of that order. We grant the Taylors’ motion to supplement the record. Upon review of the record, as supplemented, we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Taylor v. Davis, No. 2:13-cv-02717-RMG (D.S.C. Sept. 11, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.