U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2015

Jean Dalle Essoka v. Loretta Lynch

Jean Dalle Essoka v. Loretta Lynch
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 26, 2015

Jean Dalle Essoka v. Loretta Lynch

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-2221

JEAN ROGER DALLE ESSOKA, Petitioner, v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General, Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: June 18, 2015 Decided: June 26, 2015

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Danielle Beach-Oswald, Terese Tadros Ibarra, BEACH-OSWALD IMMIGRATION LAW ASSOCIATES, PC, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Benjamin C. Mizer, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Cindy S. Ferrier, Assistant Director, Joseph A. O’Connell, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Jean Roger Dalle Essoka, a native and citizen of Cameroon, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying his motion to reopen. We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion as untimely. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a), (c) (2014). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Dalle Essoka (B.I.A. Oct. 8, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.