UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1130

RUNGRUDEE SUTEERACHANON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MCDONALD’S RESTAURANTS OF MARYLAND, INC., Defendant - Appellee, and MCDONALD’S CORPORATION, Defendant.

No. 15-1131

RUNGRUDEE SUTEERACHANON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MCDONALD’S RESTAURANTS OF MARYLAND, INC., Defendant - Appellee.

No. 15-1132

RUNGRUDEE SUTEERACHANON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MCDONALD’S RESTAURANTS OF MARYLAND, INC., Defendant - Appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, Senior District Judge. (8:13-cv-02889-RWT; 8:13-cv-03150-RWT; 8:13-cv-02890-RWT)

Submitted: June 25, 2015 Decided: June 29, 2015

Before GREGORY, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rungrudee Suteerachanon, Appellant Pro Se. Nigel F. Telman, Amanda C. Wiley, PROSKAUER ROSE LLP, Chicago, Illinois; Alex Chad Weinstein, PROSKAUER ROSE LLP, Washington, DC, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Rungrudee Suteerachanon appeals the district court’s orders dismissing her employment discrimination actions and denying her motion to reconsider under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Suteerachanon v. McDonald’s Rest. of Md., Inc., Nos. 8:13-cv-02889-RWT; 8:13-cv- 03150-RWT; 8:13-cv-02890-RWT (D. Md. Nov. 24, 2014 & Jan. 9, 2015).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED