Kevin Smith v. Parcell
Kevin Smith v. Parcell
605 F. App'x 223
Kevin Smith v. Parcell
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Kevin Leon Smith appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the' district court. Smith v. Parcell, No. 3:13-cv-00564-JRS-RCY (E.D.Va. Mar. 24, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.