U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2015

Mark Brooks v. Dadma Lydia Diaz C

Mark Brooks v. Dadma Lydia Diaz C
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 23, 2015

Mark Brooks v. Dadma Lydia Diaz C

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1241

MARK DOUGLAS BROOKS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DADMA LYDIA DIAZ C; JUDGE LAWRENCE HAMMOND; KRISTY M. NEWTON, DA; CANDACE E. SILER; JUDGE REGINA M. JOE, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder, District Judge. (1:14-cv-00794-TDS-LPA)

Submitted: July 21, 2015 Decided: July 23, 2015

Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mark Douglas Brooks, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Mark Douglas Brooks appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his civil complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Brooks v. Diaz C, No. 1:14-cv-00794-TDS-LPA (M.D.N.C. Feb. 19, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.