U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2015

Bismark Torkornoo v. Mary Torkornoo

Bismark Torkornoo v. Mary Torkornoo
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 23, 2015

Bismark Torkornoo v. Mary Torkornoo

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1556

BISMARK KWAKU TORKORNOO, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MARY TORKORNOO; JACQUELINE E. NGOLE, Esquire; NINA HELWIG, Esquire (BIA); JOHN C. MONAHAN, Esquire; JUDGE CYNTHIA CALLAHAN; MASTER CLARK WISOR, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. (8:15-cv-00980-PJM)

Submitted: July 21, 2015 Decided: July 23, 2015

Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bismark Kwaku Torkornoo, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Bismark Kwaku Torkornoo appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his suit challenging Maryland domestic-relations proceedings for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. * We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Torkornoo v. Torkornoo, No. 8:15-cv-00980-PJM (D.

Md. Apr. 29, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* We conclude that the dismissal order is final and appealable. See In re GNC Corp., ___ F.3d ___, ___, 2015 WL 3798174, at *9 n.3 (4th Cir. June 19, 2015) (discussing standard for determining finality of order).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.