Malcolm Muhammad v. Randall Mathena
Malcolm Muhammad v. Randall Mathena
610 F. App'x 264
Malcolm Muhammad v. Randall Mathena
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Malcolm Muhammad appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Muhammad v. Mathena, No. 7:14-cv-00134-JLK-RSB, 2015 WL 300363 (W.D.Va. Jan. 22, 2015). We deny the motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.