U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2015

United States v. Charles Burgess

United States v. Charles Burgess
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 27, 2015 · Niemeyer, King, Hamilton
610 F. App'x 299

Counsel

Charles Antoine Burgess, Appellant Pro Se. Maxwell B. Cauthen, II, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

United States v. Charles Burgess

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Charles Antoine Burgess appeals from the district court order denying, without prejudice, his motion to be transferred to a federal correctional facility. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Burgess, No. 8:13-cr-00361-GRA-1 (D.S.C. Feb. 5, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.