U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2015

Janece Mickens v. Intelligent Decisions, Inc.

Janece Mickens v. Intelligent Decisions, Inc.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 27, 2015

Janece Mickens v. Intelligent Decisions, Inc.

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1381

JANECE P. MICKENS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. INTELLIGENT DECISIONS, INC.; ZAMAN KHAN; THERESA POND; SUSAN MAYER, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Anthony John Trenga, District Judge. (1:14-cv-01486-AJT-TCB)

Submitted: July 23, 2015 Decided: July 27, 2015

Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Janece P. Mickens, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Nicholas Petkovich, Amanda Vaccaro, JACKSON LEWIS PC, Reston, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Janece Mickens appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing her civil complaint for failure to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we grant Mickens leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mickens v. Intelligent Decisions, Inc., No. 1:14-cv-01486-AJT-TCB (E.D.

Va. Mar. 17, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.