U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2015

Bolarinwa Okezie v. Nicholas Leonard

Bolarinwa Okezie v. Nicholas Leonard
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 13, 2015 · Shedd, Floyd, Thacker
611 F. App'x 788

Bolarinwa Okezie v. Nicholas Leonard

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Bolarinwa Okezie filed a complaint against the Appellees, Nicholas Leonard and L. Muse, and the Defendant, Prince George’s County, Maryland, alleging claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012), and under state law. Following a trial in which the jury found for the Appel-lees on all of Okezie’s claims, the magistrate judge granted Okezie’s motion for a new trial. The jury again found for the Appellees on all claims and Okezie now appeals. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in for-ma pauperis, we affirm the magistrate judge’s order of judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.