U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2015

Terry Campbell v. Kennith Hammett

Terry Campbell v. Kennith Hammett
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 25, 2015

Terry Campbell v. Kennith Hammett

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6606

TERRY DOUGLAS CAMPBELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. INGLES MARKET, Ingles Store 92; MICHAEL CHRISTOPHER FOLK; TRAVIS TODD KING; KENNITH HAMMETT; NATHANIEL MARK RAINEY, Defendants – Appellees, and SPTG CO SHERIFFS DEPT; JOHN ALLEN PUTMAN, Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Bruce H. Hendricks, District Judge. (7:13-cv-01701-BHH)

Submitted: August 20, 2015 Decided: August 25, 2015

Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Terry Douglas Campbell, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Miller Snyder, CLARKSON WALSH TERRELL & COULTER, PA, Greenville, South Carolina; James Adam Russell, Wilson Scarborough Sheldon, WILLSON JONES CARTER & BAXLEY, P.A., Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Terry Douglas Campbell appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendations of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint and the court’s order affirming the magistrate judge’s denial of Campbell’s motions to compel discovery. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Campbell v. Hammett, No. 7:13-cv-01701-BHH (D.S.C. Feb. 26, 2014; Mar. 30, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.